- 1 cup (2 sticks) unsalted butter, at room temperature and cut into chunks
- 3/4 cup sugar
- 3/4 cup dark brown sugar, lightly packed
- 2 large eggs
- 1-1/2 teaspoons natural vanilla extract
- 2 cups all-purpose flour
- 1 teaspoon baking soda
- 1 teaspoon salt
- 1 pound bittersweet chocolate, finely chopped
- 1/2 pound toasted pecans or walnuts, finely chopped
Fresh from the oven, the cookies look crackly on top and dry around the edges, but very raw and soft in the middle. They'll harden as they cool, but if you bake them until they're solid they'll cool into a hocky puck. For most cookies but these cookies especially, it's best to underbake. These cookies are mostly nuts and chocolate anyway, so even if you underbake the chocolate will solidify at room temperature and hold the cookie together.
Don't:
- Chop the nuts too finely. I don't know about you, but I like crispy walnut chunks in my cookies.
- Chop the chocolate too coarsely. I had my chocolate almost in shreds, and I didn't have any chunks that were even half as big as a chocolate chip. It really helps give this cookie a cohesive chocolate flavor and soft chocolate-ness instead of big pockets of hard chocolate here and there.
- Put the dough in the fridge. I did this for my last batch because I was worried that the dough might have started to melt sitting in a hot kitchen. The last batch looked more like the bad cookie above than any of the other batches. I don't think the cold dough could spread properly, and the edges just melted out into ugly flatness.
- Let these cookies sit out too long. Put them in a tupperware container and freeze them until you want to eat them. A cookie this thin and so chock full of nuts and chocolate won't take long to come back up to room temperature, but if you just keep them in a container at room temperature or in the fridge the nuts might go stale.
- Be afraid to experiment with cookie size. Some of my cookies were smaller, and I thought they were actually cuter and a more manageable size. I just enough dough to roll a ball about two-thirds the size of a golf ball.
Consensus: great! I would put in even more nuts next time, perhaps substituting out a half cup of chocolate. But it's Michael Mina's recipe (which he says his young son knows how to make), and the cookies definitely turned out like the ones I had at the restaurant. Crisp around the edges, crackly on top, and very soft and chewy in the center. I love cookies that have this texture, so I think this recipe's a keeper. It's going to be fun trying variaions on this theme: whole wheat pastry flour instead of white, adding raisins and/or oatmeal, using peppermint oil or almond extract, and of course experimenting with pecans and almonds. Happiness may come in a cookie after all; I think I've broken my cookie curse!
If only I had the time and energy to make root beer sherbet and sassafras ice cream as well. One day I will, if only to prove that I have as much culinary talent as Michael Mina's seven year old son.
Link to recipe
8 comments:
Hmm, looks like a perfect job for my fabulous cookie dough scooper, which was given to me by someone very, very cool.
Definitely. This batter is the perfect consistency for use with a cookie scoop.
Random fact: cookie scoops are numbered. The number indicates how many scoops any particular scoop makes out of a quart. I don't know how that would useful for cookie batter unless the recipe tells you how much dough you end up with, but it sure might come in handy for a part (how many quarts do I need for 12 diners?). I love PBS.
And that "definitely" refers to both how perfect your cookie scoop would be for this job and the fabulousness of the gifter of that scoop. Modesty is for the weak (oh, no I didn't!)
i'd never heard of a cookie scoop before. i'll get one after my first kitchenaid standmixer.
Haha. Get the cookie scoop first. It's like $10.
So I have a question...How different are these cookies, and what is the flavor and texture like? I ask as the recipe is quite familiar...Nestle Tollhouse comes to mind. Granted, slight tweaks with baked goods make huge differences, so that's what I'm wondering about.
Great pics as always.
To Jo above: the cookie scoop is the best thing that will ever happen to your baking...after a kitchenaid standmixer that is...run don't walk and get them both.
Hey Aaron, someone on Chowhound asked the exact same question (how are these different from normal chocolate chip cookies?) and my answer is:
The problem, of course, is that no one has a definitive answer for what "normal" means for a chocolate chip cookie.
To me, if we take the Nestle Tollhouse version as normal, this recipe is better because:
-more chocolate
-more nuts
-chocolate is chopped up finely so it's distributed and mixed into the batter instead of being in chunks
-crispy around the edges and top, but chewy inside
-somehow doesn't taste as cloying, despite having plenty of chocolate and sugar
-every bite's the same
So if your go-to recipe already has those qualities or if those qualities don't appeal to you, this might not be the recipe for you.
Thanks for the analysis...I will definetly give it a try, as Nestle doesn't really have the dual texture going on. I also love the idea of finely chopped chocolate...it looks delicious.
When I make them, I'll give you my final verdict :)
Excellent. There's nothing we love more than a bake-a-long. And I don't mean the royal we. I mean we who are bored at work and check this site regularly to amuse ourselves.
Post a Comment